MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4324290811 · doi:10.1109/tpds.2023.3256083

A Parallel Algorithm to Accelerate DEVS Simulations in Shared Memory Architectures

2023· article· en· W4324290811 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicSimulation Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceParallel computingBenchmark (surveying)DEVSDiscrete event simulationShared memoryParallel algorithmComputationSet (abstract data type)Event (particle physics)AlgorithmDistributed computingModeling and simulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a new algorithm for the execution of Discrete Event System Specification (DEVS) simulations on parallel shared memory architectures. Our approach executes parallel discrete-event simulations by executing all tasks in the PDEVS simulation protocol in parallel. The algorithm works by distributing the computations among different cores on shared memory architectures. To show the benefits of our algorithm, we present the results of a set of experiments using a synthetic benchmark and a real-world scenario using two independent computer architectures. The results obtained show how our algorithm accelerates simulations up to eight times, improving previous approaches. In addition, we show that our approach scales when we increase the number of CPU-cores used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score0.858

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it