Similarities and Differences in the Perception of Atopic Dermatitis Burden Between Patients, Caregivers, and Independent Physicians (AD-GAP Survey)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Atopic dermatitis (AD)-a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by intense itching-can have a detrimental impact on quality of life (QoL). We report results of a quantitative assessment of pediatric patient, caregiver, and physician perceptions of AD burden in children and adolescents. METHODS: Pediatric patients (aged 6-11 [children] or 12-17 [adolescents] years) with moderate-to-severe AD, their caregivers, and independent physicians were recruited in 13 countries. Caregivers and their children/adolescents completed an online survey about the impact of AD on 16 key items of patient QoL. Physicians completed surveys on their patients aged 6-11 and 12-17 years. Best-worst scaling was used to rank the importance of the QoL items. RESULTS: Overall, 1447 children/adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD (aged 6-11 years: 701; 12-17 years: 746), 1447 caregivers, and 1092 physicians participated. Patients and caregivers in both age groups ranked disturbed sleep as the most important QoL item, followed by feeling ashamed because of AD. Independent physicians ranked feeling ashamed because of AD as the most important QoL item for both age groups, followed by disturbed sleep for those aged 6-11 years and being singled out for those aged 12-17 years. The relative importance of the 16 QoL items to patients was strongly aligned between patients in both age groups and their caregivers, but somewhat less so between patients and physicians. Between-country differences were more apparent in physician- versus patient-/caregiver-reported results. CONCLUSION: The most burdensome QoL items were impact of AD on sleep and feeling ashamed. Caregivers and physicians correctly identified the QoL items most burdensome to patients. However, patient and caregiver perceptions were generally more closely aligned than patient and physician perceptions. Between-country differences in perceptions (particularly for physicians) were observed, probably due to multifactorial reasons, necessitating further evaluation. Video Abstract (MP4 42,877 kb) INFOGRAPHIC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".