Regional Elevation of Liver T1 in Fontan Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD) is characterized by hepatic congestion and progressive hepatic fibrosis in patients with the Fontan operation. This condition is generally clinically silent until late, necessitating techniques for early detection. Liver T1 mapping has been used to screen for FALD, but without consideration of regional variations in T1 values. Methods: Liver T1 measured with a liver-specific T1 mapping sequence (PROFIT1) in Fontan patients was compared with cohorts of patients with biventricular congenital heart disease (BiV-CHD) and controls with normal cardiac function and anatomy. Results: < 0.001). Conclusions: Fontan patients have globally increased liver T1 values and consistent spatial variations, with higher values in the peripheral liver regions as compared with spatially uniform values in BiV-CHD and controls. The spatial patterns may provide insight into the progression of FALD. Liver T1 mapping studies should include uniform spatial coverage to avoid bias based on slice locations in this population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".