MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4324354040 · doi:10.3791/64942

Advancing the Assessment of Cardiac Injury and Function

2023· editorial· en· W4324354040 on OpenAlexaff
Ienglam Lei, Pierre‐Emmanuel Noly, Paul C. Tang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Visualized Experiments · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institutes of HealthAmerican Heart Association
KeywordsFunction (biology)Cardiac function curveMedicineNeuroscienceBiologyCardiologyCell biologyHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While heart transplantation is the most effective therapeutic modality for end-stage heart failure, less than 50% of potential donors become actual heart donors.The main cause of donor heart underutilization is the maximum 4 h ischemic time allowed during mechanical arrest with cold storage, which limits the geographic distribution of hearts due to transportation time limitations.Importantly, prolonged ischemic time is an important risk factor for primary graft dysfunction (PGD), when the donor heart output is insufficient for organ perfusion.PGD is a significant challenge that occurs in 10%-20% of heart transplants.While the 1 month heart transplant mortality rate is approximately 8%, PGD accounts for 39% of these deaths.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0090.019
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.434 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Visualized ExperimentsSame topicCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationFrench-language works237,207