“From the West, Clouds come hurrying with the wind” - Caribbean & African feminism: Trends Examined
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To describe Caribbean and African feminism as interwoven is an understatement. Their correlation is irrefutable, sharing commonalities across concepts of gender and sexuality, labour, and feminist organization. Both feminisms share the distinctive characteristic of being in constant flux, being especially influenced by the colonial structures that continue to pervade our society today. As a result of colonialism, the gender identity and sexuality of the Caribbean and African female subject have been subject to regulation and policing, in order to ensure that the recipients of patriarchal privilege are made explicit. Likewise, attempts have also been made to control the Caribbean and African entrepreneurial community. The space these women have created for themselves in order to escape the racialised and genderised barriers associated with formal labour, is being constantly devalued through the implication that this space is in need of legitimisation. Over time, these feminisms have grown to centre a multitude of social, economic and political concerns. The contributions they have made to society however, are under constant threat of erasure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it