MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Isotopic Constraints on the Nature of Primary Precipitates in Archean–Early Paleoproterozoic Iron Formations from Determinations of the Iron Phonon Density of States of Greenalite and 2L- and 6L-Ferrihydrite

2023· article· en· W4324356427 on OpenAlexaff
Andy W. Heard, Nicolas Dauphas, Isaac L. Hinz, Jena E. Johnson, Marc Blanchard, E. Ercan, Michael Y. Hu, Jiyong Zhao, Barbara Lavina, Mark E. Fornace, Justin Y. Hu, Mathieu Roskosz, Corliss Kin I Sio, Nicole X. Nie, Benoı̂t Baptiste

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Earth and Space Chemistry · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersArgonne National LaboratoryBasic Energy SciencesNuclear Safety and Security CommissionWoods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionOffice of ScienceAgouron InstituteNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationU.S. Department of EnergyUniversity of ChicagoDivision of Earth SciencesNational Science Foundation
KeywordsFerrihydriteFerrousBanded iron formationSilicateOxidation stateGeologyChemistryEquilibrium fractionationGeochemistryArcheanFractionationIsotope fractionationPhysical chemistryMetal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Iron formations (IFs) are chemical sedimentary rocks that were widely deposited before the Great Oxidation Event (GOE) around 2.4–2.2 Ga. It is generally thought that IFs precipitated as hydrated Fe 3+ oxides (HFOs) such as ferrihydrite following surface oxidation of Fe 2+ -rich, anoxic deep waters. This model often implicates biological oxidation and underpins reconstructions of marine nutrient concentrations. However, nanoscale petrography indicates that an Fe 2+ silicate, greenalite, is a common primary mineral in well-preserved IFs, motivating an alternative depositional model of anoxic ferrous silicate precipitation. It is unclear, however, if Fe 2+ -rich silicates can produce the Fe isotopic variations in IFs that are well explained by Fe 2+ oxidation. To address this question, we constrain the equilibrium Fe isotopic ( 56 Fe/ 54 Fe) fractionation of greenalite and ferrihydrite by determining the iron phonon densities of states for those minerals. We use ab initio density functional theory (DFT + U ) calculations and nuclear resonant inelastic X-ray scattering spectroscopy to show that ferrous greenalite should be isotopically lighter than ferrihydrite by ∼1–1.2‰ at equilibrium, and fractionation should scale linearly with increasing Fe 3+ content in greenalite. By anchoring ferrihydrite–greenalite mineral pair fractionations to published experimental Fe isotopic fractionations between HFOs and aqueous Fe 2+, we show that ferrous greenalite may produce all but the heaviest pre-GOE Fe isotopic compositions and mixed valence greenalites can produce the entire record. Our results suggest that heavy Fe isotope enrichments alone are not diagnostic of primary IF mineralogies, and ferrihydrite and partially oxidized or even purely ferrous greenalite are all viable primary IF mineralogies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Earth and Space ChemistrySame topicGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisFrench-language works237,207