MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A preliminary investigation of the feeding behaviour of dairy goat kids reared away from their dams on a computerised ad libitum milk feeding system

2023· article· en· W4324369592 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Animal Behaviour Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMealAnimal scienceBreedWhole milkMathematicsBiologyFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most commercial dairy goat famers use ad libitum milk feeding set-ups that allow constant, unrestricted milk access to artificially rear goat kids. No detailed information on how kids use these ad libitum milk systems exists and characterising this would help target future research and improve management. The aim was to describe and characterise the individual and group milk feeding behaviour of 16 castrated male dairy breed goat kids from 22 to 56 days of age, in two pens fed from a computerised milk feeder supplying one teat per pen. Solid feed and water intakes were measured from 15 to 70 days of age and Average Daily Gain (ADG) calculated. Repeated measures mixed models produced weekly estimated marginal means of milk feeding variables. Factors influencing ADG were investigated using residual maximum likelihood analysis. Spearman’s rank correlations investigated the relationship between pen-level feeding behaviour variables and age. Meal criterions were created by fitting a mixture of Gaussians to determine a threshold value. On average it took 7.8 days before kids were reliably suckling alone (range 2–15 days). Each day kids spent on average 24.3 ± 1.80 min feeding and consumed 1968 ± 99.6 ml of milk. Mean individual daily milk consumption increased with age (p < 0.001; 1623 ml/day week four to 2222 ml/day week 8), as did milk intake per meal (p < 0.001). The number of daily rewarded milk station visits averaged 8.4 ± 0.14 (range 2 – 19). Daily milk meals and time spent milk feeding was not impacted by age (p 0.666; p 0.095). ADG was not associated with age (p 0.226; weekly average 0.19 – 0.22) and was most impacted by an interaction between daily milk intake and week (p < 0.001). All solid feed and water intakes were positively correlated with age during the milk-feeding period (p < 0.001) and increased steeply when weaning occurred at the industry average of 56 days old. Each kid consumed 5.9 ± 0.28 meals per day (1.4 ± 0.9 visits to the teat per meal), which lasted 4.1 ± 0.22 min and resulted in a consumption of 342.8 ± 20.7 ml. There was little evidence of close consecutive feeding, 57% within the ‘social’ meal Gaussian-defined time criteria were individual feeds, only 21% consisted of two kids, 10% three and 12% four or more kids, however, 74% of milk intake occurred during meals with > 2 kids. This study showed that a computerised milk feeder can provide data on goat kid feeding which can be used as a baseline for future research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.735
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it