DR‐NAP: Data reduction strategy using neural adaptation phenomenon in wireless sensor networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Internet of Things (IoT) has got significant popularity among the researchers' community as they have been applied in numerous application domains. Most of the IoT applications are implemented with the help of wireless sensor networks (WSNs). These WSNs use different sensor nodes with a limited battery power supply. Hence, the energy of the sensor node is considered as one of the primary constraints of WSN. Besides, data communication in WSN dissipates more energy than processing the data. In most WSNs applications, the sensed data generated from the same location sensor nodes are identical or time‐series/periodical data. This redundant data transmission leads to more energy consumption. To reduce the energy consumption, a data reduction strategy using neural adaptation phenomenon (DR‐NAP) has been proposed to decrease the communication energy in routing data to the BS in WSN. The neural adaptation phenomenon has been utilized for designing a simple data reduction scheme to decrease the amount of data transmitted. In this way, the sensor node energy is saved and the lifetime of the network is enhanced. The proposed approach has been implanted in the existing gravitational search algorithm (GSA)‐based clustered routing for WSN. The sensed data are transmitted to CH and BS using DR‐NAP. Real sensor data from the Intel Berkeley Research lab have been used for conducting the experiments. The experiment results show 47.82% and 51.96% of improvement in network lifetime when compared with GSA‐based clustered routing and clustering scheme using Canada Geese Migration Principle (CS‐CGMP) for routing, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".