Integration of design and control for renewable energy systems with an application to anaerobic digestion: A deep deterministic policy gradient framework
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, the urgent need to develop sustainable processes to curb the effects of climate change has gained global attention and led to the transition into green technologies, such as Anaerobic Digestion Systems (AD). As these technologies present a complex dynamic behavior, there is a motivation to seek for new ways to optimize these systems. This study presents a Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) strategy for integration of process design and control. DDPG is a state-of-the-art reinforcement learning algorithm used to search for optimal solutions. The proposed approach considers stochastic disturbances and parametric uncertainty. Also, a penalty function included in the reward function is considered to account for process constraints. The proposed approach was tested in AD systems involving Tequila vinasses. Two reactor AD configurations were explored under multiple scenarios using the proposed DDPG strategy. While the two-stage AD system required a larger capital investment in exchange of higher amounts of biogas being produced, the single-stage AD system required less investment in capital costs in exchange of producing less biogas and therefore lower revenues than the two-stage system. The results showed that DDPG was able to identify optimal design and control profiles thus making it an attractive method for optimal process design and operations management of renewable systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".