MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4324378662 · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1181056

Editorial: Neutrophil death regulation in critical illness

2023· editorial· en· W4324378662 on OpenAlexaff
Jiafeng Wang, Bingwei Sun, John C. Marshall

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Immunology · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSepsisMedicineImmunologyARDSPathogenesisOrgan dysfunctionDampSeptic shockInflammationSystemic inflammatory response syndromeAcute pancreatitisNeutrophil extracellular trapsLungInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neutrophils are the most abundant white blood cells in peripheral blood, and the first line of defense against bacterial infection. They also contribute to organ injury in critical illness, in disorders such as sepsis, trauma, shock and acute pancreatitis (1). In response to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), spontaneous neutrophil apoptosis is inhibited and cell survival prolonged. Dysregulation of neutrophil death is associated with impaired bactericidal capacity and an amplified inflammatory response, both of which lead to organ injury (2). In this series, we summarize recent experimental findings on: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a large number of death across the world and In summary, the studies included in this topic provided an additional perspective on the importance of neutrophil death, and derangements in its expression, in the pathogenesis of critical illness, including sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, ischemia reperfusion injury, COVID-19, and atherosclerosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0090.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in ImmunologySame topicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative MechanismsFrench-language works237,207