MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4324386798 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c00268

Water-Soluble Copper(I) Hydroxide Catalyst and Its Formation in Ligand-Free Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-Coupling Reactions

2023· article· en· W4324386798 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Priya Karna, Y. Zou Finfrock, Junjie Li, Yongfeng Hu, Dong‐Sheng Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCatalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersArgonne National LaboratoryDivision of ChemistryU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceCanadian Light SourceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCatalysisCopperChemistryHydroxideAqueous solutionInorganic chemistryIodideCoupling reactionMetalPhotochemistryLigand (biochemistry)Auger electron spectroscopyAbsorption spectroscopyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Copper has emerged as an alternative metal for metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions due to its low cost, readily availability, and low toxicity. This article reports a water-soluble active molecular catalyst and its formation in the ligand-free Suzuki – Miyaura (SM) cross-coupling reactions with copper iodide as the precatalyst in aqueous solutions. The SM coupling is homogeneous in nature, and the molecular catalyst is Cu(OH) in its singlet electronic state as identified by experimental and computational UV–vis absorption spectroscopy. The Cu(OH) catalyst is generated through the leaching of oval-shaped Cu 2 O nanoparticles, which are characterized with X-ray Auger electron spectroscopy, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. The soluble Cu(OH) species is stable for at least 4 weeks under ambient conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.620

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicCatalytic Cross-Coupling ReactionsFrench-language works237,207