Conceptualisation du rôle du psychologue auprès des couples en traitement de fertilité à partir d’une recherche qualitative sur le don d’ovules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article vise à 1) décrire les besoins psychologiques exprimés par les couples receveurs d’un don d’ovules tout au long de la trajectoire médicale et leurs attentes en termes d’accompagnement, et à 2) proposer des interventions cliniques à la lumière des enjeux et des besoins exprimés par les couples. Des entretiens semi-dirigés ont été menés auprès de treize participants. Les analyses thématiques et conceptualisantes ont permis de dégager les enjeux psychologiques, les besoins et les attentes des couples receveurs tout au long de la trajectoire médicale. Les balises d’un accompagnement clinique de ces couples ainsi que des pistes de réflexion quant au savoir-être et au savoir-faire du psychologue sont décrites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".