Mapping cross-species connectome atlas of human and macaque striatum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cross-species connectome atlas (CCA) that can provide connectionally homogeneous and homologous brain nodes is essential and customized for cross-species neuroscience. However, existing CCAs were flawed in design and coarse-grained in results. In this study, a normative mapping framework of CCA was proposed and applied on human and macaque striatum. Specifically, all striatal voxels in the 2 species were mixed together and classified based on their represented and characterized feature of within-striatum resting-state functional connectivity, which was shared between the species. Six pairs of striatal parcels in these species were delineated in both hemispheres. Furthermore, this striatal parcellation was demonstrated by the best-matched whole-brain functional and structural connectivity between interspecies corresponding subregions. Besides, detailed interspecies differences in whole-brain multimodal connectivities and involved brain functions of these subregions were described to flesh out this CCA of striatum. In particular, this flexible and scalable mapping framework enables reliable construction of CCA of the whole brain, which would enable reliable findings in future cross-species research and advance our understandings into how the human brain works.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".