L’accès aux origines : de la reconnaissance d’un droit fondamental à l’émergence de nouvelles catégories relationnelles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir du cas de la France, cet article aborde l’évolution de la question des origines dans les situations adoptives et issues de l’assistance médicale à la procréation avec don, croisant les changements des lois et des pratiques institutionnelles et les expériences des personnes concernées. Traitant successivement de l’adoption en France et de la création du Conseil national d’accès aux origines personnelles (Cnaop), de l’évolution de l’adoption internationale puis de la récente levée de l’anonymat des dons de gamètes, il explicite comment la question des origines s’est tout d’abord manifestée par des enjeux relatifs aux droits fondamentaux, liant protection des enfants et construction des identités personnelles, avant de soulever des interrogations quant aux reconfigurations relationnelles induites par le rapport aux origines, aux confins de la parenté.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".