Growth, structure refinement, thermal expansion and optical spectroscopy of Tm3+-doped MgMoO4
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thulium-doped magnesium molybdate single-crystal (Tm3+:MgMoO4) was grown by the Czochralski method (melting point: 1322 °C). The actual Tm3+ doping level was measured to be 0.1 at.% (the segregation coefficient was only 0.02). Tm:MgMoO4 belongs to the monoclinic class (sp. gr. C2/m, lattice constants: a = 10.2769(2) Å, b = 9.2898(5) Å, c = 7.0269(4) Å, β = 106.898(6)°). The thermal expansion tensor of this crystal is determined. Its thermal conductivity is also measured at 50–300 K (at room temperature, it amounts to 2.64 Wm−1K−1). Polarized Raman spectra are presented and the strongest mode is found at 957 cm−1. Optical spectroscopy of Tm3+ ions is studied indicating broad emission bands extending beyond 2 μm (the 3F4 → 3H6 transition) and a long lifetime of the 3F4 excited-state (1.972 ms). This makes Tm:MgMoO4 promising for broadly tunable and mode-locked lasers, when the technological problem of fabricating crystals with higher Tm3+ concentrations will be solved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".