MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

AI assisted pothole detection and depth estimation

2023· article· en· W4327563528 on OpenAlexaff
Eshta Ranyal, Ayan Sadhu, Kamal Jain

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPothole (geology)Benchmark (surveying)Computer sciencePoint cloudPhotogrammetryArtificial intelligenceRGB color modelObject detectionReal-time computingComputer visionSegmentationGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AI-assisted engineering solutions integrated with commercial RGB sensors and computationally intensive Graphical Processing Units (GPUs) promise a low-cost solution, to prevent deterioration of premature pavement disintegration. Potholes a common pavement distress are a severe threat to road safety and demand time and cost-effective state-of-the-art technologies for road inspection and condition monitoring. An intelligent pavement pothole detection system is proposed in this study by modifying the single stage CNN architecture-RetinaNet to detect potholes and perform metrological studies using 3D vision. The photogrammetric technique of structure from motion based on image frames extracted from pavement video recordings is used to model the 3D point cloud structure of potholes to assess the severity of the detected potholes as a function of its depth and is integrated with the CNN based pothole detection system. High F1 scores on benchmark dataset with a high value of 0.98, validate the model’s performance. A mean error below 5% is obtained on the measured depths thus promising an intelligent and practical solution to be implemented as part of a potential pavement health assessment system for future practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.804
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringFrench-language works237,207