MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327581049 · doi:10.3749/2200033

A Method for Detrital Corundum Characterization in Sediments: Case Study of the Gem Mountain Mine Placer Sapphire Deposit (Rock Creek, Montana, USA)

2023· article· en· W4327581049 on OpenAlexaff
Philippe M. Belley

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMineralogy and Gemology Studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorundumGeologyMineralogyGrain sizeHeavy mineralQuartzMineralSapphireTexture (cosmology)Crystal (programming language)GeochemistrySedimentGeomorphologyMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A new, comprehensive approach to characterizing detrital corundum in sediments and placer deposits is outlined and applied to a sample of poorly sorted, mud-supported colluvium rich in rhyolite tuff clasts from the sapphire-producing layer at Gem Mountain Mine, Rock Creek, Montana. High angularity and the predominance of inherited surface features indicate that corundum was not abraded during transport, consistent with deposition by mass wasting. Corundum grain abundances per 10 kg of sediment (rounded to nearest whole number) are as follows: 4–8 mm (1 grain), 2–4 mm (12 grains), 1.0–2.0 mm (10 grains), 0.5–1.0 mm (43 grains), 0.25–0.50 mm (90 grains), 0.125–0.250 mm (480 grains), and <0.125 mm (55 grains; underrepresentation due to poor recovery). The ∼ 50× abundance of corundum in <2 mm size fractions relative to the >2 mm size fraction of potential economic interest suggests that fine-grained corundum may have potential as a pathfinder for gem corundum deposits in heavy mineral surveys. Corundum grains are transparent and divided into four types by surface texture and extent of crystal face development: (1) rounded with frosted surface, anhedral/subhedral; (2) angular with hillocky/irregular surface, anhedral/subhedral; (3) angular subhedral grains with glassy curved faces; and (4) angular, idiomorphic blue grains (all <1 mm). Surface texture Types 1–3 occur in pastel-colored corundum (green, yellowish-green, yellow, colorless) and are the result of dissolution subsequent to euhedral crystal growth. Mineral inclusions in corundum include: pastel corundum – biotite (variable Fe, Mg, Ti, F contents), plagioclase feldspar (andesine-labradorite), rutile, hercynite; blue corundum – alkali feldspar, rutile, zircon, ilmenite, apatite, spinel. Corundum uncommonly occurs in composite grains with biotite, plagioclase, and K-feldspar. Rhyolite occurs as a partial encrustation on one corundum grain. Rock Creek corundum may have originated from partially melted metapelite in a metamorphic basement, and incorporated and transported to the surface by rhyolitic magmas. Due to scant geologic context and an absence of radiometric age data, the proposed genetic model remains highly speculative.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Mineralogy and PetrologySame topicMineralogy and Gemology StudiesFrench-language works237,207