MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327604743 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.180229

Efficiency Measurement of Tourism and Recreation Companies (Industry Code E51) Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange

2023· article· en· W4327604743 on OpenAlex
Erika Pritasari Wybawa, Myrza Rahmanita, Adhi Trirachmadi Mumin, ‎ Nurbaeti, Hermanto Siregar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Trade and Competitiveness
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecreationStock exchangeTourismBusinessStock (firearms)Code of practiceAccountingFinanceEngineeringGeographyMetallurgyEngineering managementMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

COVID-19 pandemic which the first outbreak was found on December 2019 in Wuhan, China, has given great impact to tourism industries worldwide.Since then, most countries implemented lockdown and quarantine system, issued tight regulations about travel restriction.In order to survive the COVID-19 pandemic, which the ending has yet to be determined, every tourism industry must be able to work efficiently to maintain the usage of operating costs as low as possible since the revenue could not be optimized.This research aims to measure efficiency score of 41 companies in Tourism and Recreation Industry (code E51) listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2018 to 2021.At the first stage, data envelopment analysis (DEA) method with variable-return-to-scale (VRS) input-oriented approach is employed to estimate technical efficiency scores.At the second stage, left-truncated regression estimation with double-bootstrap is employed to test the significance of some explanatory factors.Cost of Sales and Revenue, Operating expenses, Interest expenses, and Fixed Assets are chosen as input variables, while Sales and Revenue, Profit (Loss) from Operation, and Asset Turnover Ratio as output variables of DEA.The result shows that efficiency score dropped by 20.42% in 2020 compared to the score in 2019.A slight increase of 2.39% in 2021 compared to the score in 2020.Another result also denotes that several explanatory factors such as Stock Price positively affected efficiency score of, meanwhile Liability to Asset Ratio gave negative influences.Finally, this research may contribute to the development of operation and management science in hospitality and tourism field as well as to support the business operators to adjust their strategic plans, especially in financial budgeting, to face the longimpact of COVID-19 pandemic.Efficiency measurement using advanced DEA Double Bootstrap method with selected financial parameters that are different from any previous studies in tourism provides novelty to this research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it