Valuable, Rare, Inimitable, Non-Substitutable of Resources in Building Innovation Capability for Sustainable Development: Evidence from Creative Social Enterprises
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper aims to discover the valuable, rare, inimitable, non-substitutable (VRIN) resources of CSEs that contribute to the building of IC in creative social enterprises.The process of building IC is complex and is influenced by many factors; hence knowing which to IC building in CSEs will be very important and beneficial for any firm.The research used a qualitative exploratory study design with multiple case studies on five creative social enterprises in Indonesia.Interviews and a literature review were used to collect data.The research subjects are five entrepreneurs and five R&D managers.These founders have over five years of sustainable business experience.The study points out eight VRIN resources that contribute to different stages of IC building: local arts and culture; waste; co-creation capability; creative people; local people's participation; reduce, reuse, recycle; micro manufacturing; environmentally friendly technology.The IC outcomes are new sustainable products and a new process, which is brand storytelling.The findings could help entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship educators by allowing them to plan ahead of time to develop VRIN resources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".