MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327616954 · doi:10.1142/s0217979224500437

The multiple exp-function method to obtain soliton solutions of the conformable Date–Jimbo–Kashiwara–Miwa equations

2023· article· en· W4327616954 on OpenAlex
Zahra Eidinejad, Reza Saadati, Chenkuan Li, Javad Vahidi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics B · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Waves and Solitons
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolitonSymbolic computationMapleRepresentation (politics)Conformable matrixPhysicsNonlinear systemTraveling waveMathematical physicsFunction (biology)Mathematical analysisMathematicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Considering the importance of using nonlinear evolution equations in the investigation of many natural phenomena, in this paper, we consider the [Formula: see text]-dimensional Date–Jimbo–Kashiwara–Miwa ([Formula: see text]-dimensional DJKM) equation, we will investigate the solutions for this equation. Using the multiple exp functions method, we obtain analytical solutions for this equation, which are one-soliton, two-soliton and three-soliton solutions and these solutions include three categories of soliton wave solutions, i.e., one-wave solutions, two-wave solutions and three wave solutions. We have performed all calculations with a computer algebra system such as Maple and have also provided a graphical representation of the obtained solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.304

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it