MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327617101 · doi:10.1002/adom.202202754

Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence and Room‐Temperature Phosphorescence in Sulfidoazatriangulene‐Based Materials and their S‐oxides

2023· article· en· W4327617101 on OpenAlexafffund
Seja A. Elgadi, Don M. Mayder, Ryoga Hojo, Zachary M. Hudson

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Optical Materials · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsPhosphorescenceMaterials scienceQuantum yieldPhotoluminescenceMolar absorptivityPhotochemistryLuminescenceFluorescenceAbsorption (acoustics)OptoelectronicsOpticsChemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Structural constraint is an emerging strategy for improving the photoluminescence quantum yield, molar absorptivity, and color purity of luminescent materials. In this report, emitters displaying thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) are achieved for the first time using the planarized donor sulfidotetramethyazatriangulene (SMAT). Compared to non‐planarized phenothiazine (PTZ) donors, the enhanced rigidity of SMAT contributes to improved color purity and photoluminescence quantum yield, with up to 90% quantum yield observed for donor–acceptor compounds in toluene solution. Planarized SMAT‐based emitters also offer up to tenfold enhancement in two‐photon absorption cross‐section compared to analogous PTZ‐based materials. Oxidation of sulfur‐containing donors to sulfoxide and sulfone derivatives is demonstrated as a simple and generalizable means of tuning the electron‐donating ability of sulfur‐containing moieties. SMAT‐TRZ and SOMAT‐TRZ both exhibit TADF, with green and blue emission, respectively, while SO2MAT‐TRZ displays blue room temperature phosphorescence. Overall, this work demonstrates that SMAT and its S‐oxides can be used to design high‐performance luminescent materials with emergent properties such as TADF or room‐temperature phosphorescence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Optical MaterialsSame topicOrganic Light-Emitting Diodes ResearchFrench-language works237,207