MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4327636792 · doi:10.1017/9781846150418.005

The Common Celtic Church

2002· other· en· W4327636792 on OpenAlexaff
Michael W. Herren, Shirley Ann Brown

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeresyBishopsIrishCeltic languagesPeriod (music)HistoryArchbishopAncient historyClassicsLawArtPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Some evidence for a common Church It is our hypothesis that there was a common Church in Britain and Ireland in the period ca 450 – ca 630. This period embraces the time from the alleged expulsion of the leaders of the Pelagian heresy (discussed in the previous chapter) down to the intrusion of Romanising elements in Ireland and the establishment of a Roman Church in Anglo-Saxon England. After the expulsion of the ‘heresiarchs’ from Britain it may be assumed that a separate Pelagian Church, with its own bishops and clergy, ceased to exist; yet, if we can trust Rhygyfarch’s Lifeof St David , the heresy was not finally suppressed in Britain before some point around or after the mid-sixth century. Even after this, Pelagian ways of thought, which many Britons doubtless never viewed as heretical, persisted. Combining with the effort- based semi-Pelagianism that lay at the heart of the nascent monastic movement, they formed the matrix of theology and ecclesiastical practice in Britain. The early Christian community in Ireland, which may be as old as the fourth century, may have already included Pelagian sympathisers in its numbers, and the papally-sponsored mission of Palladius may have been ineffective in its effort to eradicate them. We can only assume that the continuing presence of British clergy in Ireland in the fifth and sixth centuries reinforced patterns of belief which may have looked like pollution to outsiders, but remained as invisible as the surrounding air to natives. Whereas there was never a central ecclesiastical government for the British and Irish Churches of this period, and local differences may have developed, there was surely a common set of beliefs and practices that demarcated the ‘transmarine’ Church from the continental. The common Celtic Church developed its peculiarities through isolation. After the departure of Roman forces from Britain in 410, the Church of Rome would have been much reduced in her ability to enforce decrees in that region. It is noteworthy that the two campaigns against the Pelagian heresy in Britain were carried out from Gaul rather than Rome. Prosper of Aquitaine alluded to the remoteness of Britain and its reputation as a retreat for the ‘enemies of grace’. The contacts between the British Church and the continent, so well attested in the fourth century, dwindle in the fifth and sixth centuries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.014
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedieval Literature and History→French-language works237,207→