MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4327636855 · doi:10.1017/9781846150418.009

Epilogue

2002· other· en· W4327636855 on OpenAlexaff
Michael W. Herren, Shirley Ann Brown

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeresyHomelandOpposition (politics)IrishHistoryAncient historyTheologyReligious studiesClassicsPhilosophyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 418, or immediately afterwards, some British-born advocates of Pelagian teaching – and possibly Pelagius himself – returned to their homeland in the wake of an imperial interdict. Within eleven years they contrived to establish a separate ‘Pelagian Church’ in Britain, which, in the eyes of their opponents, threatened to undermine British Christianity everywhere. This Church succeeded in building on ‘pre-Pelagian’ sympathies, and radicalising them in opposition to ‘the heresy of Augustine’. In 429, Pope Celestine sent Germanus of Auxerre on a mission to Britain to suppress the movement. However, despite claimed successes, Germanus did not manage to eradicate it, as there was another ‘outbreak’ in the 440s. In 431, the same pope sent the deacon Palladius to Ireland as the first bishop to the island’s Christian community, arguably with the intention of checking any possible occurrence of the heresy there. Later in the fifth century, probably beginning in the early 460s, the Briton Patrick conducted an unsanctioned mission to convert the pagan Irish. His writings show that he was engaged against Pelagian ideas, and it is possible that his superiors, whose accusations he was forced to answer, were of Pelagian sympathies. Towards the middle of the sixth century Gildas remarked on the presence of a group in Britain who displayed Pelagian tendencies, and late evidence tells us that the Pelagians were not finally suppressed in Britain until some time in the sixth century, but that this required two synods. Around 640, a pope-elect charged that Pelagianism had been revived in Ireland. The Pelagian movement defined the common Celtic Church, which we have envisioned as a set of commonalities of theology and of some features of practice in the British and Irish Churches down to the second quarter of the seventh century. Pelagianism may have dominated this Church for only a short time, but its ideology persisted, in some form, beyond the dissolution of the common Celtic Church in the early part of the seventh century. Its adherents taught the natural goodness of man, that a sinless life was possible not only for the Jewish patriarchs but for gentiles as well, that sin was not transmitted through the blood-line, that grace was not necessary for salvation, that God predestined no one, that all men could be saved if they believed, that salvation was achieved through perfect obedience to the law, and that obedience to the law was fostered by asceticism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.554
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5540.283

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedieval Literature and History→French-language works237,207→