MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327637117 · doi:10.1017/9781580466646.006

Ingredients of a Relationship

2006· other· en· W4327637117 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicScience Education and Perceptions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMuralGlobeDepictionPanoramaPaintingArt historyAlchemyVisual artsArtHistorySociologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the autumn of 1932 the Rockefeller family invited Mexican painter Diego Rivera to create a mural for the new Rockefeller Center—a distinctive urban complex of shops, offices, theaters, restaurants, and public art on Fifth Avenue in New York City. Beginning work the following spring, Rivera offered a prescient depiction of the potential directions for modern life entitled Man at the Crossroads Looking with Hope and High Vision to the Choosing of a New and Better Future . With a robot-like worker controlling a giant turbine at the center, the mural displayed the wonders of science. In front of the man, discoveries of biology, chemistry, and physics were represented on a luminous globe. Behind him, two diagonal lenses crisscrossed, one revealing microscopic views of germs, cells, and a developing embryo, the other showing a telescopic panorama of far-flung galaxies, stars, and planets. The artist also portrayed contrasting scenes of human society on the left and the right of both fresco and political spectrum. Man at the Crossroads’ right side yielded to the world of capitalism: bleak scenes of war; unemployed workers being beaten by the police; and fancy club-goers gambling, smoking, and drinking, oblivious to the world outside. To the left, conversely, were images of a socialist society: a colorful May Day Parade, a line of muscular female athletes, and a scene of African-American and white laborers joining hands with a familiar politician-philosopher. Rivera pointedly challenged the liberality of his sponsor by endowing this figure with a striking resemblance to Vladimir Lenin. The press soon got wind of the theme of Rivera's mural, and in late April 1933 the New York World-Telegram headlined a story: “Rivera Paints Scenes of Communist Activity—and John D. [Rockefeller] Jr. Foots Bill.” The young Nelson Rockefeller—a member of the Rockefeller Center board, a trustee of the Museum of Modern Art and the second son of John D. Jr.—sought in vain to have Rivera replace Lenin's portrait with something less “offensive,” such as an image of Abraham Lincoln (according to an apocryphal version of the story), but the muralist demurred. Within a few weeks, Rivera was called down from his scaffold and made to cease work while the differences were resolved. Months of public demonstrations and private negotiations proved fruitless. With neither side willing to yield, Rivera was dismissed and the mural was demolished.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1270.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicScience Education and PerceptionsFrench-language works237,207