MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327650909 · doi:10.1080/13537903.2022.2104466

The Uncomfortable Pew: Christianity and the New Left in Toronto <b>The Uncomfortable Pew: Christianity and the New Left in Toronto</b> <b>,</b> by Bruce Douville, Montreal &amp; Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2021, <i>McGill-Queen’s Studies in the History of Religion,</i> 300 pp., CA$130.00 (hb), CA$37.95 (pb), ISBN 978–0–2280–0635–0 (hb), ISBN 978–0–2280–0636–7 (pb), ISBN 978–0–2280–0726–5 (ePDF), ISBN 978–0–2280–0727–2 (ePUB)

2023· article· en· W4327650909 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Contemporary Religion · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChristianityReligious studiesTheologySociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

How did Canadian churches engage with student radicalism in the 1960s? As Bruce Douville argues in The Uncomfortable Pew, the answer is: “In ways that might surprise you!” Contrary to the assumptio...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it