Active Human-Following Control of an Exoskeleton Robot With Body Weight Support
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents an active human-following control of the lower limb exoskeleton for gait training. First, to improve safety, considering the human balance, the OpenPose-based visual feedback is used to estimate the individual's pose, then, the active human-following algorithm is proposed for the exoskeleton robot to achieve the body weight support and active human-following. Second, taking the human's intention and voluntary efforts into account, we develop a long short-term memory (LSTM) network to extract surface electromyography (sEMG) to build the estimation model of joints' angles, that is, the multichannel sEMG signals can be correlated with flexion/extension (FE) joints' angles of the human lower limb. Finally, to make the robot motion adapt to the locomotion of subjects under uncertain nonlinear dynamics, an adaptive control strategy is designed to drive the exoskeleton robot to track the desired locomotion trajectories stably. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed control framework, several recruited subjects participated in the experiments. Experimental results show that the proposed joints' angles estimation model based on the LSTM network has a higher estimation accuracy and predicted performance compared with the existing deep neural network, and good simultaneous locomotion tracking performance is achieved by the designed control strategy, which indicates that the proposed control can assist subjects to perform gait training effectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".