The use of your own voice in labor: a phenomenological study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To understand the meaning attributed by women to the use of their own voice in labor. METHOD: Descriptive qualitative study based on the theoretical-philosophical-methodological framework of Heidegger. Phenomenological interviews were carried out with 20 women who experienced vaginal delivery without interventions in the second quarter of 2020 in the city of Rio de Janeiro - Brazil. RESULTS: The comprehensive analysis revealed that the voice can provoke a reaction from the environment that makes them suffer. The expression of the voice encompasses fear and despair. It is from what they hear that women fear being left in suffering for havingbothered the professionals. CONCLUSION: The meaning of using one's own voice in childbirth was understood as a request for help or an expression of freedom. Based on this understanding, the professionals can be opened to sensitive and individualized care, which goes beyond technology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it