Large-Scale Virtual Screening for the Discovery of SARS-CoV-2 Papain-like Protease (PLpro) Non-covalent Inhibitors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The rapid global spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus facilitated the development of novel direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs). The papain-like protease (PLpro) has been proposed as one of the major SARS-CoV-2 targets for DAAs due to its dual role in processing viral proteins and facilitating the host’s immune suppression. This dual role makes identifying small molecules that can effectively neutralize SARS-CoV-2 PLpro activity a high-priority task. However, PLpro drug discovery faces a significant challenge due to the high mobility and induced-fit effects in the protease’s active site. Herein, we virtually screened the ZINC20 database with Deep Docking (DD) to identify prospective noncovalent PLpro binders and combined ultra-large consensus docking with two pharmacophore (ph4)-filtering strategies. The analysis of active compounds revealed their somewhat-limited diversity, likely attributed to the induced-fit nature of PLpro’s active site in the crystal structures, and therefore, the use of rigid docking protocols poses inherited limitations. The top hits were assessed against recombinant viral proteins and live viruses, demonstrating desirable inhibitory activities. The best compound VPC-300195 (IC50: 15 μM) ranks among the top noncovalent PLpro inhibitors discovered through in silico methodologies. In the search for novel SARS-CoV-2 PLpro-specific chemotypes, the identified inhibitors could serve as diverse templates for the development of effective noncovalent PLpro inhibitors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".