MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327713860 · doi:10.1111/sed.13096

Genesis of island dolostones during rapid island subsidence: Example from the Xisha (Paracel) islands, South China Sea

2023· article· en· W4327713860 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSedimentology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersState Key Laboratory of Marine GeologyState Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental GeologyNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsUnconformityGeologySubaerialBrecciaDolostoneGeochemistryCarbonatePaleontologyFluid inclusionsCaveCarbonate rockSedimentary rockQuartzArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Miocene carbonate successions found on many isolated oceanic islands throughout south‐east Asia commonly include unconformity capped ‘island dolostones’ units. On Shidao, located in the Xisha Islands in the South China Sea, well XK‐1 (1268.2 m deep) penetrated a thick succession of carbonates before being terminated in the Jurassic metamorphic basement. The lower part of the succession is composed of the Sanya Formation (Early Miocene) and the overlying Meishan Formation (Middle Miocene), ca 700 m thick, that are formed of limestones and dolostones. An unconformity divides the Sanya Formation into a Lower Member formed largely of limestones, and an Upper Member formed of dolostones (DI‐8). DI‐8 is separated by a major unconformity into lower (DI‐8L) and upper (DI‐8U) units, that both include numerous subaerial unconformities. The overlying Meishan Formation is a limestone succession that includes three unconformity‐capped dolostones intervals (DI‐5, DI‐6 and DI‐7). Strata below the numerous exposure surfaces throughout the Sanya and Meishan formations are highlighted by Fe‐staining, biomoulds, cavities, caves and solution breccia development. The weakly fabric‐retentive dolostones in DI‐5 to DI‐8 are formed of dolomite crystals that have a dirty core encased by a clear rim, with δ 18 O values of +0.3 to +4.7‰ (average +2.0‰, n = 50), δ 13 C values of +2.2 to +3.2‰ (average +2.5‰, n = 50), Fe concentrations of 44 to 442 ppm (average 149 ppm, n = 50), Mn concentrations of 5 to 197 ppm (average 27 ppm, n = 50), Sr concentrations of 169 to 257 ppm (average 218 ppm, n = 50) and 87 Sr/ 86 Sr values of 0.70847 to 0.70900 (average 0.70879, n = 32). In all cases, dolomitization post‐dated the subaerial exposure. The 87 Sr/ 86 Sr values suggest that the dolostones in DI‐8L formed during the late Early Miocene, whereas the dolostones in DI‐8U, DI‐7, DI‐6 and DI‐5 probably formed simultaneously during the Late Miocene even though these units are stratigraphically hundreds of metres apart and were located well below sea‐level. Dolomitization was preferentially focused in those strata with high porosities and permeabilities that allowed easy circulation of the seawater through the rock. This model suggests that dolomitization was not restricted to strata that were at or close to sea‐level. Although dolomitization may have been related to the new oceanographic circulation regime established during that time, the exact properties of the seawater that promoted dolomitization are open to debate. This model of dolomitization may be applicable to many of the ‘island dolostones’ that are found in the oceans throughout the world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it