Fourier spectral theory of pulsed photothermal radiometry, signal analysis, and parametric measurements in two-layered media
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A theoretical model of pulsed photothermal radiometry based on conduction-radiation theory is introduced for a two-layered medium with a first layer having optical and thermal properties different from those of the semi-infinite substrate. This geometry closely represents the optical and thermal properties of biotissues, a major intended application. The theory derives the spatial distribution of the frequency spectrum of the pulsed photothermal signal from the composite two-layer boundary-value problem and matches the spectral frequency domain results to the measured photothermal transients through an efficient inverse Fourier transformation algorithm, which involves the optical, thermal, and geometric parameters of the experimental system. This approach avoids the complicated and computationally expensive analytical Laplace transform approach usually adopted in similar studies and yields a complete conduction–radiation description of photothermal signals without simplifying, yet restrictive, approximations encountered in the literature. Numerical and experimental tests of the model using intralipid solution as layer 1 and semi-infinite solid samples such black rubber and anodized aluminum as layer 2 of the medium are described. The radiation heat transfer coefficients from the air–intralipid and intralipid–solid interfaces were introduced to complement the conductive blackbody-radiated infrared signal component at the detecting camera. The best-fitted parameters and heat transfer coefficients are compared to theoretical and experimental data, and the results of these tests were found to be consistent with the theoretical model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".