MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327715303 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-cvmhj

Nickel Complexes of Allyl and Vinyldiphenylphosphine

2023· preprint· en· W4327715303 on OpenAlexafffund
Marissa L. Clapson, David J. Nelson, Marcus W. Drover

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAmerican Chemical Society Petroleum Research FundCarnegie Trust for the Universities of ScotlandCanada Foundation for InnovationCouncil of Ontario UniversitiesUniversity of WindsorUniversity of Strathclyde
KeywordsOlefin fiberNickelChemistry1,5-CyclooctadieneCyclooctadieneCatalysisReactivity (psychology)DiphenylphosphineMedicinal chemistryPhosphineOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monophosphine-ligated nickel compounds e.g., [Ni(PPh3)4] are relevant as active catalysts across a broad range of reactions. This report expands upon the coordi-nation chemistry of this family, offering the reactivity of allyl- and vinyl-substituted diphenylphosphine (PPh2R) with [Ni(COD)2] (COD = 1,5-cyclooctadiene). These reac-tions provide three-coordinate dinickelacycles that are intermolecularly tethered through adjacent {Ni}-olefin interactions. The ring confirmation of such cycles has been studied in the solid-state and using theoretical calcula-tions. Here, a difference in reaction outcome is linked to the presence of an allyl vs. vinyl group, where the former is observed to undergo rearrangement, bringing about challenges in clean product isolation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207