MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327750484 · doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101112

Protocol for a remote home-based upper extremity self-training program for community-dwelling individuals after stroke

2023· article· en· W4327750484 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Grace Kim, Amanda Gahlot, Camille Magsombol, Margaret Waskiewicz, Nettie Capasso, Steve Van Lew, Yael Goverover, Victoria Vaughan Dickson

Bibliographic record

VenueContemporary Clinical Trials Communications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAmerican Occupational Therapy Foundation
KeywordsRehabilitationInterviewQualitative propertyIntervention (counseling)MedicineHemiparesisPhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationStroke (engine)Motivational interviewingPsychologyNursingComputer scienceEngineeringPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Half of all stroke survivors experience hemiparesis on the contralateral side, resulting in chronic upper extremity (UE) impairment. Remote rehabilitation is a promising approach to optimize the gains made in the clinic to maximize function and promote UE use at home. This paper describes the study protocol for a remote home-based UE self-training program. Design: This was a feasibility study that used a convergent mixed methods approach. Methods: We collected data on 15 community-dwelling individuals with UE hemiparesis after stroke. The study used motivational interviewing (MI) and ecological momentary assessments (EMA) to maximize engagement in a 4-week personalized UE self-training program. The study consisted of three phases: 1) training in MI for the interventionists 2) creating customized treatment plans using shared decision making, and 3) four weeks of UE self-training. Measures and analysis: To evaluate feasibility, we will summarize recruitment and retention rates, intervention delivery, acceptance, adherence, and safety. Quantitative UE outcomes will measure change in UE status after the intervention (Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Motor Activity Log, Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, and bilateral magnitude ratio). Qualitative data (1:1 semi-structured interviews) will capture participants' perceptions and experience with the intervention. Quantitative and qualitative data will be integrated to gain a deeper understanding of the facilitators and barriers for engagement and adherence to UE self-training. Conclusion: The results of this study will advance the scientific knowledge for use of MI and EMA as methods for enhancing adherence and engagement in UE self-training in stroke rehabilitation. The ultimate impact of this research will be to improve UE recovery for individuals with stroke transitioning back into community. Clinical trials registration: NCT05032638.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.300

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0900.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.565
GPT teacher head0.553
Teacher spread0.012 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContemporary Clinical Trials CommunicationsSame topicStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryFrench-language works237,207