MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327756847 · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2023.104109

Longitudinal relationships between teachers’ utility values and quitting intentions: A person-organization fit perspective

2023· article· en· W4327756847 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Hui Wang, Robert M. Klassen

Bibliographic record

VenueTeaching and Teacher Education · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaEducation University of Hong Kong
KeywordsPsychologyStructural equation modelingPerspective (graphical)PerceptionSocial psychologySample (material)Longitudinal studyDevelopmental psychologyStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This five-month, two-wave longitudinal study investigated the direct associations between teachers' utility values and quitting intentions, as well as the indirect associations between utility values and teacher outcomes via perceived person-organization fit. The sample included 1,086 Canadian teachers. Results from the latent change structural equation modeling suggested that teachers’ social and personal utility values at the beginning of the semester were directly and indirectly associated with their quitting intentions, as mediated by perceived person-organization fit. Analyses into the pattern of changes further found that increased social utility values corresponded with increased fit perceptions, yielding decreased intentions to leave current schools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTeaching and Teacher EducationSame topicMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsFrench-language works237,207