MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327770703 · doi:10.35366/109999

Impacto del trasplante renal en la función ventricular izquierda medida por ecocardiografía y electrocardiografía en una Unidad de Tercer Nivel

2023· article· es· W4327770703 on OpenAlexaff
Víctor Manuel Durán-Sáinz, Juan Ignacio Soto-González, Yoloxóchitl García-Jiménez, Gustavo Martínez-Mier, Andrés Palacios-Sarabia, José Manuel Reyes-Ruíz

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Mexicana de Trasplantes · 2023
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMedicinePhilosophyCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introducción: la enfermedad renal crónica representa un problema de salud pública con prevalencia mundial de 697 millones de casos y que condiciona un alto riesgo cardiovascular, incrementando la mortalidad.El trasplante renal mejora la función cardiaca con un aumento de la fracción de expulsión del ventrículo izquierdo (FEVI), reducción de la hipertrofia ventricular entre otros, lo que impacta en la supervivencia.La ecocardiografía es una herramienta práctica disponible para la detección de estos cambios cardiacos antes y después del trasplante renal.Objetivo: determinar el impacto a corto, mediano y largo plazo del trasplante renal sobre la función cardiaca a través de ecocardiograma y electrocardiograma en pacientes trasplantados en la Unidad Médica de Alta Especialidad (UMAE) Hospital de Especialidades No. 14 de Veracruz.Material y métodos: estu-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Mexicana de TrasplantesSame topicMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesFrench-language works237,207