MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327777786 · doi:10.1039/d3fd00029j

Kinetics of CN (<i>v</i> = 1) reactions with butadiene isomers at low temperature by cw-cavity ring-down in a pulsed Laval flow with theoretical modelling of rates and entrance channel branching

2023· article· en· W4327777786 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shameemah Thawoos, Gregory E. Hall, Carlo Cavallotti, Arthur G. Suits

Bibliographic record

VenueFaraday Discussions · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistero dell'Università e della RicercaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsChemistryKineticsExcited state1,3-ButadieneCavity ring-down spectroscopyChemical kineticsBranching fractionReaction rateBranching (polymer chemistry)Ring (chemistry)Analytical Chemistry (journal)Atomic physicsSpectroscopyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

= 1) with the 1,2-butadiene isomer here for the first time. The experimental results were interpreted with the aid of variable reaction-coordinate transition-state theory calculations to determine rates and branching of the addition channels based on a high-level multireference treatment of the potential energy surface. H-abstraction reaction rates were also theoretically determined. For the 1,2-butadiene system, theoretical estimates are then combined with literature values for the energy-dependent product yields from the initial adducts to predict overall temperature-dependent product branching. H loss giving 2-cyano-1,3-butadiene + H is the main product channel, exclusive of abstraction, at all energies, but methyl loss forming 1-cyano-prop-3-yne is 15% at low temperature growing to 35% at 500 K. Abstraction forming HCN and various radicals is important at 500 K and above. The astrochemical implications of these results are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.356
Threshold uncertainty score0.546

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFaraday DiscussionsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207