MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327796657 · doi:10.1109/tia.2023.3258425

Maximum Resolution Based Method for Balancing Capacitor Voltages in 7-Level Single Phase Flying-Capacitor Wavelet Modulated Inverters

2023· article· en· W4327796657 on OpenAlexaff
S. A. Saleh

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitorVoltageDecoupling capacitorInverterReservoir capacitorControl theory (sociology)WaveletVariable capacitorEngineeringElectronic engineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper develops and tests a method for balancing capacitor voltages in 7-level flying-capacitor (FC) inverters, which are operated by the wavelet modulation (WM) technique. This multi-level inverter has two capacitors in each pole, whose voltages deviate due to changes in its loading level. In order to ensure that all switching elements experience identical voltage stresses and no circulating currents, the voltage across each capacitor has to be maintained very close to its reference value. The proposed method to balance the capacitor voltage is based on adjusting the scales of resolution segmented wavelet basis functions, which are used as switching signals to operate a 7-level FC inverter. The adjustments of the scales can vary the widths and locations of switching pulses produced by the WM technique. The proposed capacitor voltage method is structured using a proportional-integral controller to adjust the scales, thus balancing the capacitor voltages. The accuracy, effectiveness, and response speed of the proposed method to balance capacitor voltage are demonstrated through simulation and experimental test cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industry ApplicationsSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207