MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERTENSIVE ENCEPHALOPATHY IN THE BACKGROUND OF RESISTANT ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION

2022· article· en· W4327808220 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
KH.YO. SHARIPOVA, F.N. ABDULLOEV, R.G. SOKHIBOV, D.D. RAKHIMOV, G.M. NEGMATOV

Bibliographic record

VenueAvicenna Bulletin · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuropsychologyMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCognitionInternal medicineTrail Making TestMedicineNeuropsychological testHemodynamicsEncephalopathyNeuropsychological assessmentCued speechNeuropsychological testingCardiologyAudiologyPsychologyPediatricsCognitive impairmentPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To assess the severity of CI in relation to the level of RDR to antihypertensive therapy in patients with primary arterial hypertension (AH) and the features of CI on the background of RAH. Methods: A complex of modern clinical, hemodynamic and neuropsychological methods was used to assess RDR to treatment and the severity of CI in groups of patients with high and very high RDR to treatment: the group I – with controlled arterial hypertension (CAH; n=40), the group II – with RAH (n=35). Results: When screening for CI on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale, a decrease in the average number of various domains of cognitive function in patients with CAH was found against the background of increased RDR to treatment compared with RAH. The results of the neurodynamic analysis of cognitive function in the Trail Making Test (TMT) indicate the relative sustain of selective attention and information processing speed. However, the established increase in the difference between the part B and part A performance in patients with AH demonstrated a decline in flexible thinking, cognitive control, and programming. The results of the study of regulatory functions showed that frontal dysfunction was observed more often in patients of group II, although the difference was statistically insignificant (p>0.05). Based on the results of speech studies, along with the results of memory impairment testing in the Clock Drawing (CDT) and Free and Cued Selective Reminding – Immediate Recall (FCSRT-IR) tests, a more pronounced decline of semantic memory was found in patients with RAH, indicating the possibility of memory impairment not only due to secondary neurodynamic changes but also due to the neurodegenerative processes. Conclusion: A significant decrease in semantic memory in patients with RAH suggests the possibility of the transformation of cerebral vascular lesions into neurodegenerative ones or their combination. Keywords: Neuropsychological profile, cognitive impairment, hypertensive encephalopathy, risk of developing resistance to treatment, resistant arterial hypertension.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.474
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAvicenna BulletinSame topicNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207