Day-Ahead Prediction of Distributed Regional-Scale Photovoltaic Power
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Day-ahead forecasts are required by electricity market investors to make informed decisions on the trading floor. Whereas it is relatively easier to predict the performance of a few large-scale photovoltaic (PV) systems, a large number of small-scale PV systems with a wide geographical spread poses more challenges because they are often not metered for real-time monitoring. This paper proposes an artificial neural network (ANN)-based model to achieve regional-scale day-ahead PV power forecasts based on weather variables from numerical weather predictions (excluding solar irradiance) as inputs. The model was first implemented by dividing a region into clusters and selecting a representative site for each cluster using data dimension reduction algorithms. Solar irradiance forecasts were then generated for each representative PV system and the corresponding PV power was simulated. The cluster power output was obtained using a linear upscaling model and summed to produce regional-scale power forecasts. The model’s accuracy is validated using power generation data of several distributed systems in California. The results show at least a 29-percent root mean square error reduction over the benchmarking models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".