MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327852093 · doi:10.17161/randa.v17i3.16105

Salamander Sci-Art

2010· article· en· W4327852093 on OpenAlexaff
Peter R. Warny, Stanley K. Sessions, Brandon Ballengée

Bibliographic record

VenueReptiles & Amphibians · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNature ConservancyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSalamanderEcologyGeographyEnvironmental scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

secondary sex ratios in samples of snakes must be interpreted with caution because they can be influenced by many factors that differentially affect the two sexes, and changes in actual population structure may be a minor factor.sex ratios in samples have been shown to change rapidly when differential sexual behavior is affected.shine et al. ( 2006) found significant daily variation in sex ratios of samples of Garter snakes as they emerged from hibernation.these variations were related to time in season and daily maximum and minimum temperatures.In my study, greater activity by males in the spring and, in some species, in the autumn searching for mates and/or favorable habitat are probably the most important factors in the male-biased secondary sex ratios of these eight species of snakes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReptiles & AmphibiansSame topicInterdisciplinary Research and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207