MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4327861845 · doi:10.1101/2023.03.16.23287369

Altered Amygdala Volumes and Microstructure in Focal Epilepsy Patients with Tonic-Clonic Seizures, Ictal and Post-Ictal Central Apnea

2023· preprint· en· W4327861845 on OpenAlexaff
Claudia Zeicu, Antoine Legouhy, Catherine Scott, Joana F. A. Oliveira, Gavin P. Winston, John S. Duncan, Sjoerd B. Vos, Maria Thom, Samden Lhatoo, Hui Zhang, Ronald M. Harper, Beate Diehl

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeUniversity College LondonMedical Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchNational Imaging Facility
KeywordsIctalEpilepsyMedicineApneaAnesthesiaCohortCardiologyAmygdalaInternal medicinePsychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract and key words Objectives Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is a leading cause of death for patients with epilepsy; however, the pathophysiology remains unclear. Focal-to-bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS) are a major risk factor, and centrally-mediated respiratory depression may increase the risk further. Here, we determined volume and microstructure of the amygdala, a key structure that can trigger apnea in people with focal epilepsy, stratified by presence or absence of FBTCS, ictal central apnea (ICA) and post-ictal central apnea (PICA). Methods 73 patients with only-focal seizures and 30 with FBTCS recorded during video EEG (VEEG) with respiratory monitoring were recruited prospectively during presurgical investigations. We acquired high-resolution T1-weighted anatomical and multi-shell diffusion images, and computed neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) metrics in all epilepsy patients and 69 healthy controls. Amygdala volumetric and microstructure alterations were compared between healthy subjects, and patients with only-focal seizures or FBTCS The FBTCS group was further subdivided by presence of ICA and PICA, verified by VEEG. Results Bilateral amygdala volumes were significantly increased in the FBTCS cohort compared to healthy controls and the focal cohort. Patients with recorded PICA had the highest increase in bilateral amygdala volume of the FBTCS cohort. Amygdala neurite density index (NDI) values were significantly decreased in both the focal and FBTCS groups relative to healthy controls, with values in the FBTCS group being the lowest of the two. The presence of PICA was associated with significantly lower NDI values vs the non-apnea FBTCS group (p=0.004). Significance Individuals with FBTCS and PICA show significantly increased amygdala volumes and disrupted architecture bilaterally, with greater changes on the left side. The structural alterations reflected by NODDI and volume differences may be associated with inappropriate cardiorespiratory patterns mediated by the amygdala, particularly after FBTCS. Determination of amygdala volumetric and architectural changes may assist identification of individuals at risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicEpilepsy research and treatment→French-language works237,207→