MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327862088 · doi:10.1101/2023.03.11.23287141

Predicting COVID-19 pandemic waves with biologically and behaviorally informed universal differential equations

2023· preprint· en· W4327862088 on OpenAlex
Bruce Kuwahara, Chris T. Bauch

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPandemicTransmission (telecommunications)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PopulationComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMachine learningEconometricsStatistical physicsMathematicsPhysicsDiseaseMedicineTelecommunicationsInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, it became clear that pandemic waves and population responses were locked in a mutual feedback loop. The initial lull following strict interventions in the first wave often led to a second wave, as restrictions were relaxed. We test the ability of new hybrid machine learning techniques, namely universal differential equations (UDEs) with learning biases, to make predictions in a such a dynamic behavior-disease setting. We develop a UDE model for COVID-19 and test it both with and without learning biases describing simple assumptions about disease transmission and population response. Our results show that UDEs, particularly when supplied with learning biases, are capable of learning coupled behavior-disease dynamics and predicting second waves in a variety of populations. The model predicts a second wave of infections 55% of the time across all populations, having been trained only on the first wave. The predicted second wave is larger than the first. Without learning biases, model predictions are hampered: the unbiased model predicts a second wave only 25% of the time, typically smaller than the first. The biased model consistently predicts the expected increase in the transmission rate with rising mobility, whereas the unbiased model predicts a decrease in mobility as often as a continued increase. The biased model also achieves better accuracy on its training data thanks to fewer and less severely divergent trajectories. These results indicate that biologically informed machine learning can generate qualitatively correct mid to long-term predictions of COVID-19 pandemic waves. Significance statement Universal differential equations are a relatively new modelling technique where neural networks use data to learn unknown components of a dynamical system. We demonstrate for the first time that this technique is able to extract valuable information from data on a coupled behaviour-disease system. Our model was able to learn the interplay between COVID-19 infections and time spent travelling to retail and recreation locations in order to predict a second wave of cases, having been trained only on the first wave. We also demonstrate that adding additional terms to the universal differential equation’s loss function that penalize implausible solutions improves training time and leads to improved predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.788

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it