MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327862686 · doi:10.1353/jaas.2023.0012

In Memoriam: Y-Dang Troeung (張依蘭) (ទរងអដង) (1980–2022)

2023· article· en· W4327862686 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christopher B. Patterson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Asian American Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHong Kong and Taiwan Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChorusWifeMeaning (existential)NinthTheologyArtHistoryLiteraturePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In MemoriamY-Dang Troeung (張依蘭) (ទ្រឿងអ៊ីដាង) (1980–2022) Christopher B. Patterson (and the still-surviving chorus) Click for larger view View full resolution [End Page 87] I am writing this memoriam fifty-three days after the death of my wife, my partner, my soulmate, my editor, my collaborator, and my co-parent, Y-Dang Troeung. It is four days after the forty-ninth day, when we buried Y-Dang's ashes in Vancouver's Mountain View Cemetery with a gravestone that marks both our names. It is thirteen days since her forty-third birthday, a day we celebrated by eating her favorite dim sum: har gao, chaozhou fun guo, and siu mai. Since Y-Dang's death, fifty-three days have crested and fifty-three days have fallen. During these fifty-three days, I have read hundreds of letters from students, colleagues, friends, family, and distant admirers, who have all expressed their deep love for Y-Dang and have detailed the many imprints that she made upon their lives. Y-Dang did not die alone, nor do we grieve alone, or in the same ways. I knew Y-Dang perhaps better than anyone, yet there were sides to her that she revealed more to others, which too have offered meaning to her death. I have come to accept that Y-Dang will survive differently in others' memories than in my own. In turn, I have structured this memoriam to include the voices of the grieving many, who make a chorus of the surviving still; they who knew her for the many roles she, wittingly and lovingly, played for them, and for me. Danielle Wong "When we met at the 2014 Association for Asian American Studies conference in San Francisco, it felt like I was meeting a celebrity. This beloved student of Don's, who, as he had told me many times, had taught him so much. She represented for me the promise of community. Y-Dang's voice is unmistakable. Exact. Honest. And disciplined in its complexity. I realized that this is what care in scholarship looks like: care for the reader, care for the histories in the work, care for the people for whom she writes. To be as fiercely committed as Y-Dang was to the knowledge and lives of the communities for which she wrote is incredibly rare. Such a commitment will surely guide all of us who knew her into whatever we endeavor. And if you spent time with Y-Dang, you know this. When you've been in her presence, been held by her kindness and her drive, anything feels possible." Like Danielle, I met Y-Dang at a conference in 2014. It was Hong Kong in June, and the conference, "Fashion in Fiction," was one she had helped organize. Y-Dang and I often described how we met in speculative terms: as cosmic, as two destined souls encountering each other after a thousand years apart, as two ancient species who, until that moment, had believed that we were the last of [End Page 88] our kind. And Y-Dang's story felt like a tall tale. Where my life had its challenges of abuse, dogmatic faith, racism, and the constancy of alcohol and drugs, hers was a story of genocide, of being born in a refugee camp, of immense poverty, and of the racisms and hardships of small-town Canada. And yet, neither of us saw our lives as tragedies. We loved life, were happy to have survived as long as we had, and were ecstatic to be working as Assistant Professors in Asia, despite the fact that both of us had been discouraged from taking our jobs because, as we were told, "no university in North America will ever want to hire you again." What others saw as failures, we saw as opportunities. Neither of us were supposed to be here–in academia, in Asia, on this planet. We were viruses that had slipped our way into the academic system, and we had no interest in feeding its most vital organs. Our work, our collaborations, our love, would always reflect this. Shirley Geok-lin Lim"Those whom the gods…(For Y-Dang)In the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.517
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5170.428

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Asian American StudiesSame topicHong Kong and Taiwan PoliticsFrench-language works237,207