Prostate cancer segmentation from MRI by a multistream fusion encoder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Targeted prostate biopsy guided by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) detects more clinically significant lesions than conventional systemic biopsy. Lesion segmentation is required for planning MRI-targeted biopsies. The requirement for integrating image features available in T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted images poses a challenge in prostate lesion segmentation from mpMRI. PURPOSE: A flexible and efficient multistream fusion encoder is proposed in this work to facilitate the multiscale fusion of features from multiple imaging streams. A patch-based loss function is introduced to improve the accuracy in segmenting small lesions. METHODS: The proposed multistream encoder fuses features extracted in the three imaging streams at each layer of the network, thereby allowing improved feature maps to propagate downstream and benefit segmentation performance. The fusion is achieved through a spatial attention map generated by optimally weighting the contribution of the convolution outputs from each stream. This design provides flexibility for the network to highlight image modalities according to their relative influence on the segmentation performance. The encoder also performs multiscale integration by highlighting the input feature maps (low-level features) with the spatial attention maps generated from convolution outputs (high-level features). The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), serving as a cost function, is less sensitive to incorrect segmentation for small lesions. We address this issue by introducing a patch-based loss function that provides an average of the DSCs obtained from local image patches. This local average DSC is equally sensitive to large and small lesions, as the patch-based DSCs associated with small and large lesions have equal weights in this average DSC. RESULTS: scores of 82.2 and 87.6% in the lesion and patient levels, respectively. The average inference time for an axial image was 11.8 ms. CONCLUSION: The accuracy and efficiency afforded by the proposed framework would accelerate the MRI interpretation workflow of MRI-targeted biopsy and focal therapies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".