MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327910370 · doi:10.1080/15361055.2023.2179312

A Passive System Technical Specification for CANDU 6 Generation II Reactor

2023· article· en· W4327910370 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFusion Science & Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNuclear engineeringDecay heatEnvironmental scienceNuclear power plantBlackoutNatural circulationNuclear physicsEngineeringPhysicsPower (physics)Electric power system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Fukushima accident led to concerns about enhancement of safety for the new design nuclear plants and also for the existing fleet of nuclear power plants (NPPs) by introducing passive safety systems. An important objective is to increase the grace time for a plant operator to establish an alternate heat sink in the case of a station blackout (SBO) accident. Efforts made by RATEN (https://www.raten.ro/?lang=en) in the frame of H2020 PIACE projects were to implement a passive safety system in the CANadian Deuterium Uranium 6 (CANDU 6) project. In this project, RATEN was in charge of the engineering design and computational modeling aspects, required to integrate a passive safety system in the existing CANDU 6 project. In order to design a passive safety system, a 3-day SBO accident was credited to occur at the Cernavoda Unit 2 NPP, a CANDU 6–type reactor. An isolation condenser (IC) system capable of transporting the total energy produced in the reactor core due to decay heat was designed and modeled. The engineering design solutions were made by RATEN CITON (http://www.citon.ro/english_index.html), and the thermal-hydraulic analysis was performed by RATEN ICN (https://nuclear.ro/en/) using the RELAP5 computer code (https://relap53d.inl.gov/SitePages/Home.aspx) to confirm natural circulation both in the secondary and the primary circuits during the SBO accident and heat transfer capability of the IC with and without noncondensable gases. The passive safety system design consists of four (4 × 33%) closed loop independent circuits, one for each steam generator. Each loop has an IC design to transport 0.66% of nominal thermal power of the reactor. In order to avoid a rapid transient during reactor cooldown, the system is endowed with four noncondensable gas tanks (one for each IC), connected to the outlet header of each IC, provided for reducing the IC heat flux simultaneously with reactor core residual heat decrease. The design concept was adapted to the CANDU 6 reactor power and the specific layout of the Cernavoda site, starting from the Advanced Lead-cooled Fast Reactor European Demonstrator (ALFRED) patent (the demonstrator of lead fast reactor technology) passive system, to increase the plant operator grace time from 23 h (current situation) to more than 72 h.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it