PVL-Cartographer: Panoramic Vision-aided LiDAR Cartographer-based SLAM for Maverick Mobile Mapping System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mobile Mapping System (MMS) plays a crucial role in generating high-precision 3D maps for various applications. However, the traditional MMS that uses tilted LiDAR (light detection and ranging) has limitations in capturing complete information of the environment. To overcome these limitations, we propose a panoramic vision-aided Cartographer simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) system for MMS, named "PVL-Cartographer". The proposed system integrates multiple sensors to achieve accurate and robust localization and mapping. It contains two sub-systems, early fusion and middle fusion. In the early fusion, range-maps are created from LiDAR points in a panoramic image space, facilitating the incorporation of visual features. The SLAM system works with both visual features with and without augmented ranges. In the middle fusion, a pose graph combines camera and LiDAR nodes, with IMU (Inertial Measurement Unit) data providing constraints between each node. Extensive experiments in challenging outdoor scenarios demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed SLAM system in producing accurate results, even in conditions with limited features. Overall, our proposed PVL Cartographer system offers a robust and accurate solution for MMS localization and mapping.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".