MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327936212 · doi:10.5539/ijsp.v12n2p28

Olsavs: A New Algorithm For Model Selection

2023· article· en· W4327936212 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nicklaus T. Hicks, Hasthika S. Rupasinghe Arachchige Don

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Statistics and Probability · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLasso (programming language)Ordinary least squaresShrinkageMathematicsMean squared errorVariance (accounting)Feature selectionSelection (genetic algorithm)Variable (mathematics)AlgorithmRegressionStatisticsLeast-squares function approximationLinear regressionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceEstimator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The shrinkage methods such as Lasso and Relaxed Lasso introduce some bias in order to reduce the variance of the regression coefficients in multiple linear regression models. One way to reduce bias after shrinkage of the coefficients would be to apply ordinary least squares to the subset of predictors selected by the shrinkage method used. This work extensively investigated this idea and developed a new variable selection algorithm. The authors named this technique OLSAVS (Ordinary Least Squares After Variable Selection). The OLSAVS algorithm was implemented in R. Simulations were used to illustrate that the new method is able to produce better predictions with less bias for various error distributions. The OLSAVS method was compared with a few widely used shrinkage methods in terms of their achieved test root mean square error and bias.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Statistics and ProbabilitySame topicStatistical Methods and InferenceFrench-language works237,207