Effect of Combined Oral Contrraceptive Pills on Serum Total Cholesterol and Body Mass Index in Females of Reproductive Age Group
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: to find out the effect of combined oral pills on serum total cholesterol as well as Body mass Index (BMI) in two groups: females who were not using any method of hormonal contraceptives (controls) and the subjects using combined oral contraceptive pills in their reproductive age (15-49yrs) Material and Methods: This study was created and executed for this goal at Hazara University in Mansehra. Two groups of 200 married, fertile women who were not pregnant or nursing were created: Group 1 consisted of controls (females who did not use any hormonal contraception), and Group 2 consisted of participants taking combination oral tablets (COCs). The laboratory derived variables studied was serum total cholesterol. BMI was calculated. It was decided to use a 5% level of significance (p0.05). With the help of Pearson's correlation coefficient r, the relation was established. Results: Serum total cholesterol showed a statistically significant difference. BMI and serum TC did not statistically associate with one another. BMI and serum total cholesterol were positively connected in group 1 and negatively correlated in group 2, respectively. Conclusion: This study facilitated to find out a simple and save method for an efficient and reliable mode of hormonal contraception for practice by general population Keywords: Hormonal contraception, combined oral pills, serum total cholesterol
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".