MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327967145 · doi:10.3390/en16062823

Parallel Communication Optimization Based on Graph Partition for Hexagonal Neutron Transport Simulation Using MOC Method

2023· article· en· W4327967145 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jingchao Zheng, Zhiqiang Wang, Zeyi Xie, Xingjie Peng, Chen Zhao, Wenbin Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHexagonal crystal systemParallel computingComputationComputer scienceNode (physics)Neutron transportGraph partitionGraphGridPartition (number theory)Domain decomposition methodsComputational scienceTopology (electrical circuits)NeutronAlgorithmTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsPhysicsCombinatoricsChemistryGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenMOC-HEX, a neutron transport calculation code with hexagonal modular ray tracing, has the capability of domain decomposition parallelism based on an MPI parallel programming model. In this paper, the optimization of inter-node communication was studied. Starting from the specific geometric arrangement of hexagonal reactors and the communication features of the Method of Characteristics, the computation and communication of all the hexagonal assemblies are mapped to a graph structure. Then, the METIS library is used for graph partitioning to minimize the inter-node communication under the premise of load balance on each node. Numerical results of an example hexagonal core with 1968 energy groups and 1027 assemblies demonstrate that the communication time is reduced by about 90%, and the MPI parallel efficiency is increased from 82.0% to 91.5%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergiesSame topicGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studiesFrench-language works237,207