MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

DIDACTIC POSSIBILITIES OF INCREASING THE QUALITY AND EFFICIENCY OF EDUCATION IN ILLUSTRATIVE PAINTING LESSONS

2023· article· en· W4327975031 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mamatkulov Shukhrat Nazarovich

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Pedagogics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Innovation and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe artsVisual arts educationPaintingFine artSubject (documents)Block (permutation group theory)Mathematics educationQuality (philosophy)Visual artsQuarter (Canadian coin)Arts in educationRange (aeronautics)Computer sciencePedagogyArtSociologyEngineeringPsychologyLibrary scienceMathematicsEpistemologyHistoryPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The State Educational Standard for the subject "Fine Arts" in general secondary education defines compositional activity as one of the main types of art education. The last quarter of 7th grade, the Book Art block, offers a wide range of opportunities for the complex organization of students' compositional activities based on the teaching materials in this block of fine arts education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.170
GPT teacher head0.536
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of PedagogicsSame topicEducation, Innovation and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207