MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327990115 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.09678

Neural Lyapunov Control for Nonlinear Systems with Unstructured Uncertainties

2023· preprint· en· W4327990115 on OpenAlex
S. Wei, P. Krishnamurthy, Farshad Khorrami

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTamkeenYork UniversityArmy Research OfficeNew York University Abu Dhabi
KeywordsControl-Lyapunov functionInverted pendulumControl theory (sociology)Lyapunov functionBounded functionNonlinear systemLyapunov redesignController (irrigation)Computer scienceNonlinear controlMathematicsControl (management)Artificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stabilizing controller design and region of attraction (RoA) estimation are essential in nonlinear control. Moreover, it is challenging to implement a control Lyapunov function (CLF) in practice when only partial knowledge of the system is available. We propose a learning framework that can synthesize state-feedback controllers and a CLF for control-affine nonlinear systems with unstructured uncertainties. Based on a regularity condition on these uncertainties, we model them as bounded disturbances and prove that a CLF for the nominal system (estimate of the true system) is an input-to-state stable control Lyapunov function (ISS-CLF) for the true system when the CLF's gradient is bounded. We integrate the robust Lyapunov analysis with the learning of both the control law and CLF. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our learning framework on several examples, such as an inverted pendulum system, a strict-feedback system, and a cart-pole system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.471
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.122 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it